Good morning, NREB readers!

Imagine a homeowner who expects to list in January. She asks a neighbor who helped sell their house. She searches the recommended agent's name. She reads two reviews, looks at a recent listing, and notices the agent seems to know her neighborhood. By the time she picks up the phone, she has a pretty good idea whom she wants to hire.

The agent who gets that call may never know there was a competition.

The agents who don't get it may never know there was an opportunity.

That distinction matters because we spend an extraordinary amount of time teaching agents to win listing presentations. We talk about pricing decks, objection handling, commission conversations, and closing at the kitchen table. All of that matters—if the seller invites you to the table.

New research makes the earlier decision harder to ignore.

Most sellers aren't running a three-agent contest

In Zillow's 2026 Consumer Housing Trends Report, 67% of sellers who used an agent reported contacting only one agent before hiring. Another 21% contacted two; 10% contacted three. Zillow highlighted the finding again in a November 13 analysis.

That does not mean 67% hired the first agent whose name they saw. It doesn't tell us how many websites they browsed, recommendations they requested, or conversations they had with friends before making contact. It says something narrower, and perhaps more useful: for many sellers, the actual agent-contact stage is short.

Where did sellers first find the agent they used? Zillow reports 35% online, 30% through referrals, 14% through past experience with that agent, and 12% through community ties. These are reported first-discovery channels—not a map of every interaction that influenced the choice.

Meanwhile, the National Association of REALTORS®' 2026 Profile of Home Buyers and Sellers reports that 92% of sellers used an agent, a record high. Sellers haven't stopped valuing representation. The harder question for an individual agent is whose representation they choose.

A recognizable name is not the same thing as a convincing one

A referral might get someone to search your name. It doesn't guarantee they like what they find. An impressive website might get someone curious. It doesn't automatically establish that you understand their property's problem. A past client may remember you warmly and still wonder whether you're the right person for the next move, in a different market.

The 2026 Zillow survey is unusually specific about what sellers say matters when judging an agent: 80% rated trustworthiness very or extremely important, 77% said responsiveness, 75% said local or neighborhood knowledge, and 74% said a positive reputation in the community. A lower commission was rated that important by 49%. These are separate ratings, not a claim that price never matters.

There's another useful result: 42% ranked help with pricing or understanding the local market as the single most valuable service their agent provided. That is a stronger clue about what kind of expertise to demonstrate than another post announcing how many homes you sold.

Consider two hypothetical agents who both do excellent work.

One has a polished profile: Local expert. Five-star service. Call for your free home valuation. It may be true, but it sounds like thousands of other profiles.

The other makes it easy to see how they think: a clearly dated, real example of a pricing decision; an explanation of how they distinguish competing homes from merely nearby homes; and an honest look at what their listing process does—and does not—promise. No invented results. No claim that every listing gets the same outcome.

The second agent has given the homeowner something useful before a consultation even begins: evidence of judgment.

This isn't a call to flood your database with more emails. We've covered past-client follow-up before. Today's problem is different. It's what happens after someone hears your name but before they decide whether to contact you—and why the same agent might be credible to a friend who knows them, yet unconvincing to a seller checking them out for the first time.

The practical question: If a seller heard your name this morning and spent five minutes deciding whether to call, what would they find that demonstrates you're the right agent for their home?

The rest of this briefing turns that question into an audit you can run on your own business: the three paths sellers take to a first call, the proof gaps that quietly cost opportunities, a reusable one-page Seller Decision Brief, language for three types of inquiry, and a 30-day test that measures something more meaningful than social-media views.

NREB  PREMIUM MEMBER EDITION
BEYOND THE PREVIEW
 
The full picture.
The better decision.
Continue with the complete analysis, the worked examples, and the practical guidance behind this briefing. Your membership also opens every Premium edition in the archive.
 
INSIDE YOUR MEMBERSHIP
The full briefing. Useful tools. The complete archive.
YOUR NREB PREMIUM ACCESS
MONTHLY
$9.99 / mo
ANNUAL  ·  BEST VALUE
$99.99 / yr
Save $19.89 per year
Choose either plan on the next page  ·  Cancel renewal anytime
Read the complete briefing  →
All Premium briefings  ·  Full archive  ·  Bonus editions
Already a member? Sign in to NREB.news

Keep Reading